The Swarm

Mix it up with The Bee's editorial board.

June 13, 2013
PG&E president rebuts calls by San Bruno leaders for big fine

Johns.jpgPG&E President Christopher Johns seemed resigned today to paying $2 billion-plus in fines as partial penance for the 2010 San Bruno natural gas explosion, but said the $3.8 billion sought by the city of San Bruno is over the top.

The California Public Utilities Commission is contemplating imposing a $2.25 billion fine, a sum that covers the cost of safety improvements that PG&E has performed since the blast, which leveled a neighborhood and killed eight people.

"It shouldn't be any higher than the money we have spent and we've committed to spend," Johns said, placing that number at $2.2 billion, during a visit to The Bee's editorial board today. "We certainly would like it to be less than that."

Johns' visit came two weeks after a delegation led by San Bruno Mayor Jim Ruane and Sen. Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, told The Bee's editorial board that the penalty ought to be closer to $4 million, and structured in such a way that PG&E could not write off any portion of the payment.

Johns said the biggest penalty over in the United States over a gas pipe issue to date is $101.5 million. A $2.25 billion fine would represent 10 percent of the company's market capitalization.

We asked whether a penalty of $3.8 billion would force PG&E to enter bankruptcy. "I don't know whether it would," he replied. "It would definitely put us into a difficult financial situation."

Johns defended the tax write-off of roughly $900 million that PG&E could take if the CPUC imposes the $2.25 billion.

"When you make investments into the system, yes, that has tax ramifications," he said. "People portray it as a windfall for us--$2.25 billion after taxes is still, what, $1.5 billion or more. That is still a huge number."

Johns said the utility already has paid $400 million to victims of the blast, including families of the individuals who died, plus another $120 million to the city of San Bruno.

He added that the company no longer is talking with city of San Bruno officials. For now, the focus is on the regulatory proceeding before the California Public Utilities Commission.

Johns called the blast a "tragic accident," and said he is insisting on a change in corporate culture in which every employee is responsible for safety.

"We're not going to let it be something we forget," Johns said of the Sept. 10, 2010 blast.

Johns became president of PG&E in August of 2009, 13 months before the San Bruno explosion. In 2011, he earned a total compensation of $5.1 million, including $3.3 million in restricted stock rewards, according to Forbes. Unlike some businesses responsible for high-profile industrial disasters, PG&E has not seen its stock price suffer appreciably since 2010. The company's stock price had been above $48 before the blast, and dipped to $44.21 in the days after the blast. It was $44.87 today.

-- Dan Morain and Stuart Leavenworth

Photo of Christopher Johns courtesy of PG&E

About Comments

Reader comments on are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments

On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.

About The Swarm

The Swarm is written by members of The Sacramento Bee's editorial board. They meet daily and are separate from the newsroom. Views included here are those of individual writers, and do not necessarily reflect those of a majority of the board or the positions expressed in The Bee's editorials.

October 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Stuart Leavenworth on Twitter

Follow "SacBeeEditBoard" on Twitter