Weed Wars

Dispatches from the California Marijuana Front

July 20, 2010
Judge's denial of medical pot defense in San Diego stirs fury

Medical marijuana advocates are rallying to the cause of San Diego County defendant James Stacy, expressing hand-wringing outrage that the former dispensary operator is facing federal drug prosecution.

Stacy operated a medical pot shop, called "Movement in Action," in Vista. He was charged with federal counts of illegally manufacturing and distributing marijuana after a series of undercover buys by a San Diego County sheriff's detective and subsequent raids by U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration officers on his home and business.

Last week, U.S. District Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz rejected Stacy's bid to throw out the charges on grounds that President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder publicly signaled in comments last year that they wouldn't target medical marijuana operations in states where medical use is legal.

Moskowitz ruled July 12 that the Obama administration statements and policy directive on medical marijuana weren't a promise that "the DEA would never raid medical marijuana dispensaries claiming to operate in compliance with state law."

Moskowitz also agreed with prosecutors that Stacy couldn't present a "medical marijuana defense" based on California's Proposition 215 Compassionate Use Act that allowed medical pot use.

The ruling drew fierce protests from a marijuana patients' advocacy group, Americans for Safe Access.

"It is unconscionable for the federal government to continue prosecuting these cases and ruining people's lives," declared Caren Woodson, the organization's director of government affairs. Woodson also said Mosowitz's ruling "denied the accused a defense in federal court, all but guaranteeing a conviction in spite of the defendant's compliance with state law."

U.S. Rep. Sam Farr, a Democrat from Carmel, used the Stacy case to call for approval of legislation he is sponsoring to allow "defendants like Stacy" to offer evidence in federal court that their use of medical marijuana was legal under state laws. He said the legislation "would correct this aberration of justice and ensure than no one else will needlessly face years in prison."

Stacy, who due to stand trial August 30, is the latest high-profile defendant in long-running law enforcement efforts targeting medical pot distribution in San Diego County.

In an appearance before the San Diego City Council after his arrest, Stacy called for marijuana's legalization "so we do not have to suffer through publicity-seeking law enforcement and politicians that will re-interpret the law to suit their needs." He called medical marijuana "a gift from God" for patients, including the "sick and dying."

After executing search warrants on Stacy's home and business last September, authorities seized 96 marijuana plants, pot food products, business records and a loaded semi-automatic pistol.

Stacy responds, below, in a clip from his City Council appearance.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments

On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from sacbee.com. While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on sacbee.com and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.