Weed Wars

Dispatches from the California Marijuana Front

July 21, 2010
Pot measure analysis: Employers retain authority, taxes hazy

An independent critique by the state Legislative Analyst's Office provides fodder for both supporters and opponents of Proposition 19, the measure to legalize recreational marijuana use for California adults 21 and over.

The LAO analysis seems to counter at least part of a major contention of initiative opponents who argue Prop 19 would supersede employer rules.

The analysis notes that no individual can be punished, fined or discriminated against for engaging in conduct permitted by the initiative. But it also says Prop 19 "does specify that employers would retain existing rights to address consumption of marijuana that impairs and employee's job performance."

Initiative opponents argue that legalized pot could potentially cost companies and public agencies billions of dollars in federal grants if they don't maintain drug free work environments.

But the LAO report said the measure could result in state savings that could amount to "several tens of millions of dollars annually" in reduced costs from locking up people for marijuana offenses.

But the LAO said potential tax revenues promised by initiative proponents aren't guaranteed as the measure is written. It said tax monies that will result from Prop 19 "are subject to significant uncertainty."

While the initiative would give local governments authority to tax and regulate marijuana sales, the LAO said, "It is uncertain to what extent the state and local governments would in fact undertake such actions.

"It is unknown how many local governments would choose to license establishments that would grow or sell marijuana or impose an excise tax on such sales," the report said.

However, the LAO said that the potential development of "a commercial marijuana industry" could enable state and local governments to "eventually collect hundreds of millions of dollars annually in additional revenues."

It also said legalized marijuana could actually promote a new revenue stream from pot tourism, saying, "To the extend that this business activity pulled in spending from persons in other states, the measure would result in a net increase in taxable economic activity to the state."

To read the report, click here.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments

On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from sacbee.com. While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on sacbee.com and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.



About Weed Wars

Peter Hecht

From its pot fields to politics, California is the epicenter for America's marijuana discussion. This blog covers news, trends and people of the California marijuana story.

Contact reporter Peter Hecht at phecht@sacbee.com

» See the sacbee.com marijuana topics page

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Watch Bee news, lifestyle videos | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

October 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31