Weed Wars

Dispatches from the California Marijuana Front

August 13, 2010
CalChamber says Prop 19 allows pot on job, court may disagree

In its analysis of Proposition 19 and the marijuana legalization initiative's impact on employers, the California Chamber of Commerce says voters should prepare to "imagine a workplace where employees can show up to work high on marijuana and there's nothing you can do about it."

The CalChamber report
goes on to argue that - if Prop 19 passes - employers will have to accommodate pot smoking on the job, make workplace decisions based on marijuana use and surrender federal contracts for violating the Federal Drug-Free Workplace Act.

CalChamber employment law advisor Jennifer Shaw said in a statement that the initiative will lead to "compromised workplace safety, discrimination lawsuits filed by employees who use marijuana but got fired for poor performance, and increased costs of liability insurance."

And CalChamber president and CEO Allan Zaremberg echoed: "This initiative would change the way employers are required to do business in our state."

But maybe not, according to the California Supreme Court - if you use litigation over the current medical marijuana law as a guide.

Despite California voters passage of the Proposition 215 Compassionate Use Act for medical marijuana in 1996, the court ruled in 2008 that employers set their own workplace rules and pot use - legal or otherwise - can get you fired.

The court issued its ruling in the case of Gary Ross of Carmichael, who was fired after 10 days as a lead systems administrator for a Sacramento firm, RagingWire Telecommunications.

Ross had told a clinician performing a drug test as a condition of his hiring that he had a medical marijuana recommendation for back pain and spasms from injuries sustained in the U.S. Air Force. When the drug test results came in, he was fired.

The court decision
noted that opponents of Proposition 215 made arguments similar to what Prop 19 opponents are making now. It said claims that legal medical marijuana use would would "make it legal for people to smoke marijuana in the workplace" were "disingenuous."

The court ruled that Ross' employer indeed had the right to terminate him and that his firing didn't violate federal and state anti-discrimination laws. It also ruled that employers were not required to make any accommodations or waive any workplace rules for legal medical marijuana users.

The text of Proposition 19 declares that the measure doesn't override "any law prohibiting use of controlled substances in the workplace or by specific persons whose jobs involve public safety."

It also declares: "No person shall be punished, fined, discriminated against, or be denied any right or privilege for lawfully engaging in any conduct permitted by this act...providing, however, that the existing right of an employer to address consumption that actually impairs job performance by an employee shall not be affected."

Proposition 19 campaign spokesman Dan Newman said that means that employers "retain the right to prohibit and punish employees for marijuana consumption that impairs job performance" and can enforce rules to protect their status as a "drug-free" workplace.

But the CalChamber analysis argues that the anti-discrimination language in the initiative will open up employers to lawsuits and prevent them from terminating workers with positive tests for pot.

The state Supreme Court ruled in the Ross case that the federal Fair Employment and Housing Act against workplace discrimination "does not require employers to accommodate the use of illegal drugs."

Under federal law, marijuana remains illegal - regardless of how Californians vote in November.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments

On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from sacbee.com. While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on sacbee.com and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.



About Weed Wars

Peter Hecht

From its pot fields to politics, California is the epicenter for America's marijuana discussion. This blog covers news, trends and people of the California marijuana story.

Contact reporter Peter Hecht at phecht@sacbee.com

» See the sacbee.com marijuana topics page

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

October 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31