Weed Wars

Dispatches from the California Marijuana Front

October 27, 2010
CalChamber radio ad depicts Reefer Madness in the workplace

A statewide radio advertising blitz paid for by the California Chamber of Commerce's Business PAC features a commercial depicting a stoned California workforce.

The spot calling for a "no" vote on the Proposition 19 marijuana initiative is bound to get your attention. But it merits a closer look - and some chilling out on its more colorful claims.

Here is the text of the CalChamber commercial, followed by some observations:

Imagine coming out of surgery and the nurse caring for you was high - or having to work harder on your job to make up for a co-worker who shows up high on pot. It could happen in California if Proposition 19 passes.

Prop 19 would do more than simply legalize marijuana. Prop 19 is worded so broadly that it would hurt California's economy, raise business costs and make it harder to create jobs. Employees would be allowed to come to work high and employers would be unable to punish an employee for being high until after a workplace accident.

Not only could workers compensation premiums rise, businesses will lose millions in federal grants for violating federal drug laws. California's economy is bad enough. Prop 19 will hurt workers and business and cost jobs.

Twenty five California newspapers, including the Chronicle and the Bee, and Dianne Feinstein agree: Vote No on Prop 19.

The chamber's over-the-top depiction of a stoned post-surgical nurse and its frets about people coming to work high contradict rules on marijuana in the workplace upheld by the California Supreme Court and federal law.

But businesses may indeed need to worry about potential employee litigation if Proposition 19 passes, based on a declaration in the initiative: "No person shall be punished, fined, discriminated against, or be denied any right or privilege for lawfully engaging in any conduct permitted by this act."

Yet the initiative also says the measure doesn't supersede "any law prohibiting use of controlled substances in the workplace or by specific persons whose jobs involve public safety." It goes on to say "the existing right of an employer to address consumption that actually impairs performance by an employee shall not be affected."'

The chamber's warnings of companies being defenseless against stoned workers - and in danger of losing millions of dollars in federal drug-free workplace grants - don't square with a landmark 2008 state Supreme Court decision.

In the case of a Sacramento man, a legal medical marijuana user who was fired by a telecommunications firm for testing positive for pot, the court ruled that employers have a right to set and enforce workplace rules against drug use and to require drug testing.

The plaintiff, Gary Ross, contended his rights as legal marijuana user under California's 1996 Proposition 215 medical marijuana law were violated when he was dismissed after results came in from a pre-employment drug test.

The court ruled that employers can fire workers - or refuse to hire them - based on positive drug tests or impairment, whether their drug use is legal or not. It also ruled that the federal Fair Employment and Housing Act "does not require employers to accommodate the use of illegal drugs."

Notably, the court also declared that earlier claims by medical marijuana opponents who argued Proposition 215 "would make it legal to smoke marijuana in the workplace" were "obviously disingenuous." It said public intoxication laws remain in place - and stoners in the workplace can be fired just as easily as drunks.

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

hide comments

On October 14, The Sacramento Bee will temporarily remove commenting from sacbee.com. While we design the upgrade, we encourage you to tell us what you like and don't like about commenting on sacbee.com and other websites. We've heard from hundreds of you already and we're listening. Please continue to add your thoughts and questions here. We also encourage you to write Letters to the Editor on this and other topics.



About Weed Wars

Peter Hecht

From its pot fields to politics, California is the epicenter for America's marijuana discussion. This blog covers news, trends and people of the California marijuana story.

Contact reporter Peter Hecht at phecht@sacbee.com

» See the sacbee.com marijuana topics page

FOLLOW US | Get more from sacbee.com | Follow us on Twitter | Become a fan on Facebook | Get news in your inbox | View our mobile versions | e-edition: Print edition online | What our bloggers are saying

October 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31